Is It a good name —or is it just familiar?
- Katie Pannell
- Apr 16
- 3 min read
My Chick-fil-A Conspiracy Theory, Brand Psychology, and Why Your Weird Name Probably Isn’t Working Yet

Chick-fil-A is objectively a WEIRD NAME and I for one think we need to spend a lot more time thinking about it.
It’s got:
A completely nonintuitive spelling
Mystery hyphens that serve absolutely no phonetic purpose
And a capital A that feels like it wandered in from another brand
Did the cows name it themselves? Because honestly... it reads like it.
Which brings us to the age-old question: Which came first—the chicken or the cow?
Because I have a theory. The cow marketing wasn’t clever. It was a cover-up.A genius distraction from a name that made zero sense on its own.
Let’s break it down.
The Curious Case of Chick-fil-A
Here’s the actual (alleged) origin story:
Chick = chicken
fil-A = a stylized take on filet, with the capital “A” to emphasize “Grade A” quality
Together: Chick-fil-A, or “Grade A chicken filet” if you squint and ignore the nuggets.
This name shouldn’t work. It goes against every “best practice” in naming:
It’s not intuitive
It’s not clearly spelled
It references a cut of meat they barely sell
And it absolutely would not pass my NAME DROP
And yet…it’s iconic.
But not because it started strong. It worked because we got used to it.
Welcome to the Familiarity Trap
There’s a little brain quirk called the mere exposure effect—the more we see or hear something, the more we tend to like it. Even if it’s weird. Even if it’s bad. Even if it looks like a chicken-themed ransom note.
We don’t like “Chick-fil-A” because it’s a perfect name. We like it because we’ve seen it on every corner since 1967, and up until 2025 the fries were perfect. (RIP)
And here's the kicker: That name was weird back then too. We just... got used to it. Developed fond memories at Chick-fil-A.
Brand Equity vs. Brand Affinity
Let’s clear something up:
Brand affinity = How much people like your brand
Brand equity = How much your brand is worth (perceived and literal)
Affinity is emotional. Equity is earned.
You can build affinity with great marketing (hello, cows). You build equity with consistent quality and experience.
Chick-fil-A has both. But only because they’ve been consistent for decades.
If a brand new restaurant launched today with that name, no marketing, and no emotional attachment? You’d scroll right past it. Or worse—assume it’s a typo.
So... Is It a Good Name?
Not really. It’s just a familiar one—with a really good story behind it.
Here’s what made it work:
The cows distracted us
The food delivered
The marketing was relentless
And over time, the name became part of the brand mythos
You can’t shortcut your way to that kind of success with a confusing name unless you’re also willing to launch a decade-long cow campaign.
What This Means for You
You don’t have 40 years to make people fall in love with a name that only makes sense after 200 ad impressions and waffle fries.
A few spicy truths:
Just because you understand your name doesn’t mean it’s clear
Just because people like it now doesn’t mean it’s strong—it might just be familiar
And just because you crowd-sourced it in a Facebook group doesn’t mean it’s built to last
You want a name that makes sense, sparks curiosity, and earns loyalty faster than a multi-million-dollar cow campaign can pull off.
Chicken-Scratch Criteria for a Great Name
Here’s what to aim for instead:
Memorability – Can someone say it back after hearing it once?
Clarity – Does it sound like a business or like a typo?
Emotion – Does it make someone feel something?
Originality – Does it sound like you or like ChatGPT spat it out?
Stickiness – Would it work before anyone knows what you do?
Because if you’re relying on “people will get it eventually,” then congratulations—you’re not building a brand, you’re building a time bomb.
Need a Name That Doesn’t Need a Cover-Up Campaign?
Check out “IDK” or “TBD” or just Name Drop, and I’ll tell you whether your name idea is the next Chick-fil-A or just... chicken sh*t.
Comentarios